summary :
The document included definition of politics and examples of Power, Authority, and Violence. also document introduce The types of government, the United States and Sweden political parties, and discusses the types of Voting Patterns and Inequality
new/interesting :
three types of legitimate authority of Max Weber in the second category were interesting, Rational-legal authority
It was interesting to be divided into concrete Rational-legal authority, abstract traditions and charismatic authority.
and when i saw oligarchy in first time, it serve as a momentum to find out what is oligarchy
And the multI-party system of Sweden was also interesting. before read this document, i think that multi-party system will have a lot of problem because of collision with many parties
but after i read document, i learned multI-party system is well managed with a well made system
also before i read Politics and Ideology category, i thought that progressive ideology supporters is almost equal with progressive ideology supporters because of aging,
but after read this, i knew that the situation in the United States seemed unlike a korea.
discussion :
A multI-party system operates a government by several parties and The two-party system takes power after two rival parties compete with each other.
Each party has its merits and demerits, and I want to discuss which political party will be better in korea, considering party's merits and demerits
The document included definition of politics and examples of Power, Authority, and Violence. also document introduce The types of government, the United States and Sweden political parties, and discusses the types of Voting Patterns and Inequality
new/interesting :
three types of legitimate authority of Max Weber in the second category were interesting, Rational-legal authority
It was interesting to be divided into concrete Rational-legal authority, abstract traditions and charismatic authority.
and when i saw oligarchy in first time, it serve as a momentum to find out what is oligarchy
And the multI-party system of Sweden was also interesting. before read this document, i think that multi-party system will have a lot of problem because of collision with many parties
but after i read document, i learned multI-party system is well managed with a well made system
also before i read Politics and Ideology category, i thought that progressive ideology supporters is almost equal with progressive ideology supporters because of aging,
but after read this, i knew that the situation in the United States seemed unlike a korea.
discussion :
A multI-party system operates a government by several parties and The two-party system takes power after two rival parties compete with each other.
Each party has its merits and demerits, and I want to discuss which political party will be better in korea, considering party's merits and demerits
ReplyDeletePreferentially, I think korea has to refine recent meaning of democracy. In countries like korean productivity and gdp, democracy is the most appropriate system still yet.
Because a wide range of welfare which targets for all citizen is hard to us. In other words, democratic socialism is little early system to korea. It may be even more equal than democracy, but it would cause the decay of the middle class. Rather than choosing another social system, it is desirable to strengthen democratic situation now we have.