1) Summary
Politic is a process that people's community make a decision related to social and economic.
The politic power can manage to distribute public resources including labor and wealth.
Three types of Legitimate Authority
Politic is a process that people's community make a decision related to social and economic.
The politic power can manage to distribute public resources including labor and wealth.
Three types of Legitimate Authority
- Rational-legal authority : It is a form of authority according to official rules and the legality of established laws
- Traditional authority : It is the authority derived from traditional customs and social structures and can be viewed as a traditional authority if power is passed from one generation to another
- Charismatic authority : It is a form of authority that the charisma of an individual or leader is important. Representative examples There are religious founders.
- Monarchy : The monarchy is a form of government in which absolute power is given to individuals who are heads of state. It was a common form of government in the world in ancient and medieval times.
- Democracy : The democracy is a form of government in which the power is given to every people who lived country. Representative are elected by voting.
Two principles of Democracy
"All members in society have equal rights."
"All members enjoy universally recognized freedoms and rights."
- Totalitarianism : Form of government that regulating almost parts of public and private.
- Oligarchy : A political system in which a small number of people and groups exercise exclusively social-political power
- Communist State : A country in which the Communist Party plays a special or dominant role in accordance with government, statute or constitution.
- Theocracy : The theocracy is a form of government in which people who regarded as a god or divine leader rules the country.
Political power is stratified according to sex, race, age, and education level.
2) Q&A
- When viewed theoretically, is it possible to evaluate governance based on good and bad?
- If a representative of the same ability is supposed to rule the countries of the same system with the same problems, which system will solve the problems as soon as possible and which system will be the least effective?
1. I think we can't evaluate it. Because they are different, not wrong. But, if we consider inequality resulting from each types of governance, we can evaluate it good or bad.
2. I think Monarchy is best and theocracy is worst. In Monarchy, because the lord seek advice other people but theocracy like Islam country seek advice according to scripture like Quran. Therefore, I think theocracy' efficiently is worst.
The finding solution system of Monarchy is similar to the system of democracy.
Democracy also, the representative seek advise to other people.
However, absolute power is given to lord, Monarchy is easier to execute policy than Democracy. Democracy can have a trouble to execute policy because opponents attack them to get their political support.
How about other's opinion?
3) Dicussion
If an affluent life is guaranteed, can a dictatorship such as a monarchy be better than a democracy that does not guarantee such a life?
[In this statement, Affluent life means the society that no wars, no disease, no poor, no fights, no hunger, no hierarchy excluding the lord. But we can't erect the representative and must obey the lord]
My opinion
I mentioned above, types of governance are just different, no wrong. In my thought, I want to said dictatorship is better than democracy if it makes society affluent than democracy. The prime purpose of community, group, and the government is making life better. Regardless of the method of governance, if it meets this purpose, it can be said that it is a good system.
I wonder that others think like me or differently
Comments
Post a Comment